Print Print this article Email Email this article Link Trackback

HASC Roll Call on F-22 Amendment and Logic of 6 Defecting Dems

Travis | Jun 19, 2009 | there are 0 comments 0

Early Wednesday morning, the House Armed Services Committee voted 31 to 30 to add $369 million for the advanced procurement of 12 F-22 Raptors. Secretary Gates wants to end the program as scheduled in fiscal year 2010, but some members of Congress are determined to keep it alive. Gates called the Committee’s F-22 funding increase “a big problem.”

Here are printouts of the razor-thin F-22 vote (Thanks to Marie Rietmann!)

Democrats:

Republicans:

Below I summarized the rationales of the six Democrats who broke ranks and voted for more F-22 funding. Their votes make sense in context. Yet because the F-22 is built in something like 44 states, there are many lawmakers who face the same predicament.

At some point, you have to quit hedging and just cast a tough vote.

Bright (Alabama) – District includes Maxwell AFB, the home of Air University and the intellectual hub of the Air Force, as well as a Lockheed Martin plant near Troy (Lock Mart is the lead contractor on the F-22). He is also a freshman from a conservative district who is considered politically vulnerable and has already bucked the Democratic leadership this year.

Courtney (Connecticut) – The F-22’s F119 engine is built by Pratt & Whitney in Middletown, Connecticut. United Technologies Corporation has estimated that ending production of the F-22 will cost Connecticut between 2,000 and 3,000 jobs. Courtney also wants to keep F-22 production alive by selling the planes to Japan.

Giffords (Arizona) – Tucson-based Raytheon Missile Systems produces several of the air-to-air missiles - like the Sidewinder and AMRAAM – used by the F-22. Giffords is also a Frontline (aka vulnerable) Democrat in a conservative district.

Marshall (Georgia) – District includes Robins Air Force Base, home of the Warner Robins Air Logistics Center that supports the F-22’s avionics. Robins “is the largest industrial complex in Georgia, employing a workforce of over 25,584 civilians, contractors, and military members,” according to the website.

Massa (New York) – The Lock Mart plant in Owego, NY is near Massa’s district. This facility will be more affected by the VH-71 cancellation than by the F-22 halt, but the F-22 must impact the local community, too. Regardless, Massa is a Frontline Dem and his district leans conservative.

McIntrye (North Carolina) – State is home to a ton of defense installations, including F-15s at Seymour Johnson AFB that help train F-22 pilots.

tags Security Matters, Congress (all tags)


Display:

You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account by clicking right here. It's quick and free.

About This Blog

Search This Blog

Center Analysis

Growth in U.S. Defense Spending Since 2001
The Pentagon's budget has increased dramatically since 2001. In inflation-adjusted dollars, the total defense budget has grown from $432 billion in FY01 to $720 billion in FY11, a real increase of approximately 67 percent. The Pentagon’s base budget, whic...

Lips and Teeth
If it is true that North Korea’s WMD programs are being funded principally from illicit arms sales, then it is imperative that China take its UN Security Council sanctions obligations more seriously. In this new analysis, Chad O'Caroll questions whether t...

FY 2011 Threat Reduction and Nonproliferation Funding
In his historic Prague speech on nuclear weapons, President Obama pledged that the United States would lead “a new international effort to secure all vulnerable nuclear material around the world within four years.” While last year's budget request was wel...

The Obama disarmament paradox: A rebuttal
Greg Mello's recent Bulletin article "The Obama Disarmament Paradox" distorts the Obama administration's nuclear agenda by making unjustified assumptions that discredit President Barack Obama's historic commitment to seek a nuclear-weapon-free w...

Fact Sheet: 2010 Nuclear Posture Review
The Nuclear Posture Review is scheduled for release sometime in March or April 2010. The review will set U.S. nuclear weapons policy for the next five to ten years and influence the implementation of President Obama's far-reaching agenda to reduce the rol...