Print Print this article Email Email this article Link Trackback

David Brooks Applies for Thune Campaign Manager Gig

Travis | Nov 13, 2009 | there are 0 comments 0
Yes, David, you have to submit a resume just like everyone else

Yes, David, you have to submit a resume just like everyone else

This is one hell of a cover letter. My favorite reaction came from the Moderate Voice:

[Thune’s] tall and nice, plays basketball, but is only a junior senator and he has no business or administrative experience. How could anyone vote for him? Seriously, Gov. Pawlenty of Minn. is a better choice.

Yeah, who the hell would vote for that kind of guy?

By omitting a characterization of Senator Thune’s national security positions, Brooks’s column ignores one leg of the ideological stool (i.e. social + economic + foreign policy). Such a characterization would inevitably touch on nuclear weapons issues, a central concern for Thune and an area where he defines himself in opposition to President Obama...

Thune’s home state of South Dakota contains Ellsworth Air Force Base, which hosts a wing of B-1 bombers. Since the conversion of B-1s from nuclear to conventional roles was completed in 1997 (the aircraft still count against START I limits), lawmakers like Thune have fought both to preserve the existing B-1 fleet and to accelerate development of the next generation nuclear-capable bomber.

These objectives, so crucial to South Dakotans, have already brought Thune into conflict with the Obama administration’s arms control agenda. As Thune remarked in July, "I have an additional concern that by significantly reducing our strategic delivery vehicles, we may lose the bomber leg of our nuclear triad." Earlier this year, he introduced a bill declaring that it is U.S. policy:

…not to delay the next generation bomber development program by deliberations on the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review, deliberations on the Nuclear Posture Review, or negotiations over the follow-on Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START).

In other words, he doesn’t want U.S. global security strategy or international treaty obligations to interfere with procurement of his pet project. This is the type of platform-centric approach Secretary Gates warned against earlier this year in Foreign Affairs: “The key is to make sure that the strategy and risk assessment drive the procurement, rather than the other way around.”

Also, remember the Senate Republican Policy Committee report that, according to Kingston, purposefully misconstrued the Strategic Posture Commission’s findings? That was Thune’s handiwork, too.

Like Sarah Palin’s attacks on Obama’s missile defense budget, it makes sense for aspiring presidential candidates to couch barbs meant for national consumption in the guise of simple home state advocacy. If Thune decides to take the presidential plunge and starts carving out a larger public profile on national security, he is likely to focus on issues that have resonance both nationwide and in South Dakota - and nuclear weapons policy and the next generation bomber sit near the top of that list.

tags Nukes on a Blog, Senate, Posture Review (all tags)


Display:

You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account by clicking right here. It's quick and free.

About This Blog

Search This Blog

Center Analysis

Growth in U.S. Defense Spending Since 2001
The Pentagon's budget has increased dramatically since 2001. In inflation-adjusted dollars, the total defense budget has grown from $432 billion in FY01 to $720 billion in FY11, a real increase of approximately 67 percent. The Pentagon’s base budget, whic...

Lips and Teeth
If it is true that North Korea’s WMD programs are being funded principally from illicit arms sales, then it is imperative that China take its UN Security Council sanctions obligations more seriously. In this new analysis, Chad O'Caroll questions whether t...

FY 2011 Threat Reduction and Nonproliferation Funding
In his historic Prague speech on nuclear weapons, President Obama pledged that the United States would lead “a new international effort to secure all vulnerable nuclear material around the world within four years.” While last year's budget request was wel...

The Obama disarmament paradox: A rebuttal
Greg Mello's recent Bulletin article "The Obama Disarmament Paradox" distorts the Obama administration's nuclear agenda by making unjustified assumptions that discredit President Barack Obama's historic commitment to seek a nuclear-weapon-free w...

Fact Sheet: 2010 Nuclear Posture Review
The Nuclear Posture Review is scheduled for release sometime in March or April 2010. The review will set U.S. nuclear weapons policy for the next five to ten years and influence the implementation of President Obama's far-reaching agenda to reduce the rol...